I wrote: Yes, regrettably that is the case. As I said before, I heard they had > disagreements, but I sincerely hoped they would iron out the problems and > agree on the test results. But it is not possible to iron out this problem! > If you are not allowed to do a thorough analysis of the customer's > machinery . . . >
I knew there were disagreements, but I had no idea things were that bad! I would not have agreed to Lewan's symposium if I had known that Rossi was blocking the door to the customer site. I learned some time ago that the calorimetry was half-assed and godawful, just as it was in previous Rossi tests. I was hoping the problems would be fixed before the test ended. After all, if the thing actually produced heat, it would be in Rossi's interest to fix the problems and convince I.H. But unfortunately, on March 10, the I.H. press release said they had not reached agreement, so I knew it was all over. - Jed
