On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote:
That's your guess. IH agreed with the choice of Penon. That could well be > IH avoiding Rossi to cheat. > Is the suggestion that Penon was in control and that he did not allow Leonardo access to the customer installation either? Suppose for the sake of argument that somehow Penon had the ability to decide who could see the customer installation and who could not. If he allowed Leonardo access to the customer installation but not IH, what are we to conclude about his impartiality? If he did not allow Leonardo access, in the same way that he did not allow IH access, what are we to conclude about the plausibility of the suggestion? Would it make sense for Penon to have had the ability to bar Leonardo's access to the industrial installation of a shell company set up by Rossi's lawyer to hide a genuine customer? Eric
