Being a Class Action suit, it should prove interesting. I don't think the ChatGPT approach will lead to true AI as presented in Iain Banks' Culture series.
See Wolfram's book I think you might like this book – "What Is ChatGPT Doing ... and Why Does It Work?" by Stephen Wolfram. Start reading it for free: https://a.co/iphsADj On Mon, Jul 10, 2023, 10:23 AM Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Quoting the article: > > The trio [of actors] say leaked information shows that their books were >> used to develop the so-called large language models that underpin AI >> chatbots. > > > The plaintiffs say that summaries of their work produced by OpenAI’s >> ChatGPT prove that it was trained on their content. > > > I doubt that information was "leaked." It is common knowledge. How else > could the ChatBot summarize their work? I doubt they can win this lawsuit. > If I, as a human, were to read their published material and then summarize > it, no one would accuse me of plagiarism. That would be absurd. > > If the ChatBots produced the exact same material as Silverman and then > claimed it is original, that would be plagiarism. I do not think a ChatBot > would do that. I do not even think it is capable of doing that. I wish it > could do that. I have been trying to make the LENR-CANR.org ChatBot to > produce more-or-less verbatim summaries of papers, using the authors' own > terminology. It cannot do that because of the way the data is tokenized. It > does not store the exact words, and it is not capable of going back to read > them. That is what I determined by testing it in various ways, and that is > what the AI vendor and ChatBot itself told me. > > > > >
