Suit brought to Google Deepmind, too. https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/11/tech/google-ai-lawsuit/index.html
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023, 11:26 AM Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Being a Class Action suit, it should prove interesting. I don't think the > ChatGPT approach will lead to true AI as presented in Iain Banks' Culture > series. > > See Wolfram's book > I think you might like this book – "What Is ChatGPT Doing ... and Why Does > It Work?" by Stephen Wolfram. > > Start reading it for free: https://a.co/iphsADj > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023, 10:23 AM Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Quoting the article: >> >> The trio [of actors] say leaked information shows that their books were >>> used to develop the so-called large language models that underpin AI >>> chatbots. >> >> >> The plaintiffs say that summaries of their work produced by OpenAI’s >>> ChatGPT prove that it was trained on their content. >> >> >> I doubt that information was "leaked." It is common knowledge. How else >> could the ChatBot summarize their work? I doubt they can win this lawsuit. >> If I, as a human, were to read their published material and then summarize >> it, no one would accuse me of plagiarism. That would be absurd. >> >> If the ChatBots produced the exact same material as Silverman and then >> claimed it is original, that would be plagiarism. I do not think a ChatBot >> would do that. I do not even think it is capable of doing that. I wish it >> could do that. I have been trying to make the LENR-CANR.org ChatBot to >> produce more-or-less verbatim summaries of papers, using the authors' own >> terminology. It cannot do that because of the way the data is tokenized. It >> does not store the exact words, and it is not capable of going back to read >> them. That is what I determined by testing it in various ways, and that is >> what the AI vendor and ChatBot itself told me. >> >> >> >> >>
