Michel Jullian wrote: > Let's say from a falling weight, if that's ok with you.
Are we going back to gravity? We know less about gravity than magnetic & electric fields. Perhaps when we are able to create an electro-gravity coil we'll better understand gravity. Until then I predict it will require energy to generate a gravity field from such an electro-gravity coil. :-) Regards, Paul Lowrance > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Paul > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 7:07 PM > Subject: Re: [Vo]: Energy *Violations* using *standard* physics > > >> Michel Jullian wrote: >>> Never mind, let's assume you're right. How can you >> draw energy more than once from >> this, or from a falling weight? >> >> >> From what-- magnetic dipole moment, charged space, or >> what? If two magnetically >> attracted current loops move closer then energy is >> moved away from the source that >> *sustains* the current loops. From there it depends >> if the current loop decreases in >> current or they move apart. That's why I've stated >> it's *temporary* energy in terms of >> the electron spin ***unless*** something annihilates >> the electron. If the electron is >> annihilated after gaining such KE due to acceleration >> then it's permanent energy. :-) >> >> >> >> Regards, >> Paul Lowrance ____________________________________________________________________________________ Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000 hotels in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find your fit. http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097
