This is also a preliminary response to Horace. I agree that the Galileo Project is a "poor kit to offer," or whatever you wrote. However, it was designed for simplicity. Make it complicated, and "replication" becomes less likely. I'm starting for my own testing with Galileo because I'm confident that I'll see results, not because the design is optimal. There are many aspects to the design that can safely be optimized, especially by adding external monitoring of various kinds. Cathode design is an obvious place to move to, but much monkeying with it in the initial tests gets increasingly risky with how complex the change is. What you have written, Horace, isn't wasted, it will be considered as final cathode design moves forward. Fabrication through plating had already been considered. (Why use a gold wire if a gold-plated silver wire, for example, would do?)

It's been suggested that I study various topics. Great idea. When I have another lifetime to spare, I will. Seriously, every day I feel intensely the weight of my ignorance about, say, electrochemistry. Especially electrochemistry. As well, my knowledge about the behavior of various elements under alpha bombardment is severely limited. So many topics, so little time. So ... I punt. I depend on my friends and even on my enemies. They will point my bloopers out to me. In a way, I'm just a node in a network, my own intelligence is quite limited, the network's intelligence is not nearly as limited. If I don't listen to my friends, that's when I become truly stupid.

At 11:42 AM 10/25/2009, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:

5. By making the grid elements small, say under 0.1 cm, there will be a clear marking of a scale on the micrographs and this will hopefully assist in counting and locating tracks, although the hole diameter should of course be larger that the thickness of the primary metallic layer (base),


Is this supposed to be 0.1 mm?

With cumulative detectors like this, such as x-ray film and CR39, I recommend some sort of mask; that is, something that blocks the particles you are trying to detect, and casts a shadow. Not seeing particles is a good as seeing them, in a sense. Italian researchers used dental x-ray film to detect x-rays in aqueous electrochemical cells. The anode cast a shadow on the film, and they used this shadow to make various analyses. It was remarkable how much information they got out the x-rays.

Yes. Excellent idea, and easy to implement. It also brings up another possibility, time-dependent masking. One of the problems with CR-39 or LR-115 detectors is their very strength, they are cumulative. What if a mask is shifted in position so that a single detector covers a time period instead of the whole run? In addition, when the experiment is terminated, the cathode should be held against a detector for a time, for an auto-radiograph detecting residual radioactivity. With controls, of course.

Some aspects of the reports I've seen indicate that the palladium plating may be fragile and can fall off easily, so moving stuff around is tricky. However, all the CR-39 I've seen that has been immersion with direct contact with the cathode has been, essentially, overexposed, so counting of tracks in the most active areas is impossible. LR-115 should be more tolerant of high track density, that's why I'm investigating it. I also intend to play with commercial CR-39 that is not the special stuff used by Fukuvi/Landauer, which is pretty expensive. I might put a lot of it in the cell, actually displacing significant heavy water. I was going to use acrylic for that, as well as to support more precise cathode structures than the flexible polyethylene cathode support Galileo used (and substituting acrylic is safe, I expect), but why not use cheap CR-39 and then see what happens when it's etched?

Whatever I do, it has to start out very simple, or I'm unlikely to actually do it. But once I have something working and can replicate it, then the design can grow, with a baseline to compare it with. At a certain point, what I have will be sufficient to begin sales, and then the community of customers will help develop it further.

Reply via email to