Mauro,
I have to thank you again for bringing Mathis's work to my attention. I'm pretty sure I need to purchase his book. It's the least I can do to support Mathis's continuing research. I want to do more than fork over a tiny PayPal donation. Actually, I just want his book! ;-) I'm currently plowing through "EXPLAINING the ELLIPSE". It's conceivable the article might end up helping me out in my own CM computer simulation research. Hopefully I'll enjoy the challenge of trying to comprehend Miles's perception on these matters, particularly the mathematical aspects. His mathematical prowess is far more developed than my own mathematical abilities. Hopefully, I'll still be able to make some headway. OK... and now for the weird part. I fully confess the fact that the following two comments are totally unscientific in nature. They are in fact totally subjective in nature, and quite personal. But what the hey! I'll blurt them out anyway! COMMENT 1: Several years ago while disengaging my mind in the midst of jogging I found myself speculating about the link between gravity, acceleration, and the curvature of space. It was during one of these jogging sessions when I suddenly found myself "free floating" or speculating about a version of an expansion model (aka curved space), where I wondered: What if all "matter" is expanding/accelerating outwards. I then realized: If all "matter" is expanding/accelerating relative to each other, would the observer (who is also made of the same accelerated "matter") notice anything different, except for the manifestation of gravity. I was truly astonished to find that some of Mile's mathematical articles, such as the one about the precession of Mercury's orbit, where he touched on the expansion model mathematically explored the very concepts I had tried to visualize geometrically in my head while in the midst of jogging. I hasten to add that I don't mean to imply that I fully understand a significant portion of Mile's mathematical analysis concerning his interpretation of the expansion model. I'm still totally baffled by Miles's use of the trig function, the tangent (tan0) formula. I realize the function is used to calculate the curvature (angle) of space at specified distances in relation to accelerating bodies, but I don't know why we use the TAN trig function. Still doesn't make any sense to me. Nevertheless, I'm still plugging away, trying to comprehend as much as my brain can absorb. COMMENT 2: (Warning: the following commentary is totally metaphysical in nature.) Earlier today something within me moved me to make a visual comparison of Miles Mathis and that of Isaac Newton. When I made side-by-side comparisons the two individuals feel strikingly similar to me. Even more striking to me is the fact that Miles appears to be continuing the work of Newton (and Kepler), including fixing mathematical errors Isaac might have made in his most famous previous life. Miles also appears to be clarifying a slew of mathematical mistakes and/or misconceptions that he claims contemporary professionals in the sciences continue to make in regards to Newton's original math. I've found myself wondering if Miles might possibly be a new revised edition of Newton. If so, it would appear that the revised "Newton" is rounding out his already well developed mathematical prowess with enthusiastic "academic" pursuits in the arts and humanities. Looks to me as if the revised "Newton" is having a hoot of a time, too. I bet the ladies like him! ;-) He's probably a little bit relieved that he's NOT the old Newton this time around! Probably doesn't even want to speculate on such a bizarre possibility either! Why have such an albatross hanging around one's neck - specifically being metaphysically linked to a world renown mathematical genius, a glory from some past century, particularly when there's so much stuff to explore in today's world! I could see how such a "distinction" could constantly get in the way of one's current life's pursuits. Perhaps Mile's is also pursuing alchemical interests as well, though perhaps somewhat revised. For additional info on Miles Mathis' check out his web site: http://mileswmathis.com/ Miles recently published a book on his mathematical research, See Amazon out at http://tinyurl.com/35ba7zr Titled: "The UN-DEFINED FIELD and other problems" . the greatest standing errors in physics and mathematics ********************************************** Final comment. Regardless of my blatantly metaphysical mumbo-jumbo rant, it is obvious to me that Miles has some interesting things to say. As Mauro has already pointed out, I also suspect Miles will make significant contributions, even if his most noted contributions may not immediately be recognized for the significance that they truly are within our lifetime. We should also keep in mind that Miles is still a very young lad, probably still in his 30s. Give him some time and space to grow, and mature... Just as wine matures, let's see what Miles comes up with. Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
