I fully agree with the topology idea- now for more than 21 years- see
please my paper:
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/GluckPunderstand.pdf
published first in Fusion Facts edited by Hal Fox.

Yes, topology is the key but it would be good to find a better name for the
very places/sites than "cracks" that has some negative meanings .
Nano-voids would be fine, I think.
However the places are IMHO no inert vessels where just D + D or H + H
reactions take place. The walls of the nano-voids are also active
participants in  a lot of nuclear reactions. Transmutations take place- the
lattice has a role.
Peter


On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have suggested that palladium is a red herring.
>
> I think that Ed Storms has made a conceptual breakthrough that has yet to
> has impact in the broader LENR developer community. Ed Storms knows that It
> is not the material that matters, but its topology. The key to the LENR
> process is to find the proper shape of the material that is reactive. In
> essence, all the work put into material preparation is just a search for
> the mechanisms hidden in the shapes that are worked into the successful
> active substance. Any material can carry these wondrous shapes and some
> materials are more amenable to their production than others.
>
> When the essence of Ed Storms Ideas find wider acceptance in the LENR
> developers community, then progress will be swift and efforts will be
> fruitful.
>
> Cheers:   Axil
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Kelley Trezise 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> **
>> I have suggested that palladium is a red herring. If the phenomena is a
>> surface effect then the outer surface of the palladium or material X will
>> have the greatest number of defects or surface-effect areas and it has been
>> found that roughening the surface will increase the effect. So too, I
>> speculate will loading a bulk sample of palladium to the point that you
>> induce fatigue cracks which will appear first on the surface and propogate
>> inward as the internal pressure within the sample builds up due to the
>> loading with hydrogen. You could get the same effect by first stressing a
>> sample of palladium with proteum to the point that it would have shown the
>> heat effect had it been loaded with deuterium then unloading the proteum
>> and reloading it with deuterium. If the phenomena is a surface effect it
>> should show up almost immediately just as in the case with the codeposited
>> palladium and deuterium. The heat phemonema has show up in so many
>> different material combinations and conditions that there is some other
>> governing parameter other than palladium material. Granted palladium being
>> open to hydrogen would allow it to migrate into the intersticies a little
>> faster but just breaking up the material into a powder could produce the
>> necessary surface defects and porosity needed to allow the heat effect to
>> show up.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> *From:* Peter Gluck <[email protected]>
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Sent:* Monday, August 20, 2012 12:23 PM
>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Dominguez ICCF17 abstract
>>
>> I am looking this paper with very mixed feelinga.
>> Admiration for a great effort, however 5% success rate
>> due to palladiumphilia can be described by two nasty Latin sayings- too:
>>
>> Errare humanum est, persverare diabolicum
>> Parturiunt montes, nascetur ridiculus mus
>>
>> I am very sorry but Pd is not good despite...everything..
>> Don't make the skeptics happy!
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Akira Shirakawa <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2012-08-20 20:46, Jed Rothwell wrote:
>>>
>>> *Anomalous Results in Fleischmann-Pons Type Electrochemical*
>>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> This should be the result of what was mentioned in the 2012 DARPA budget
>>> review:
>>>
>>> http://nextbigfuture.com/2012/**07/darpa-nanotech-projects-**
>>> nanoscale.html<http://nextbigfuture.com/2012/07/darpa-nanotech-projects-nanoscale.html>
>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/**[email protected]/msg67364.**html<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg67364.html>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> S.A.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Peter Gluck
>> Cluj, Romania
>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
>>
>>
>


-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Reply via email to