At 03:20 PM 12/29/2012, Axil Axil wrote:
The height that the weighted piston travels upward to a stop
determines the output energy of the popper.
Well, that shows the work done by the piston.
Unavoidably, the energy associated with the feedback current must be
determined and added to the energy imparted to the piston.
If that is an experimental factor. It would be better, if it can be
done, to avoid such complications.
This experimental approach must be the simplest and cheapest one
that can be run to prove over unity energy production.
Yup. So ... why isn't it being done? When I saw the first popper, the
Bob Rohner version, I think he put a weight on top. But there was no
data on the output energy vs the input energy. The *most obvious issue.*
This experiment should be the one first run to evaluate the popper.
Yup.
John Rohner sold a popper kit, but published *no data* on how his kit
performed. Did he actually have any test data?
I wonder. Is it necessary to be obtuse to
(1) work in this field, or
(2) be interested in it?
I love it that people like Russ will get their hands dirty. But ...
why not do it Smart?
