[ Intended to be sent to vortex AND newvortex ] > From: "Abd ul-Rahman Lomax" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2013 1:53:47 PM
> Remember, I don't believe that Rossi is *actually using such a > trick.* But, in the absence of much better evidence, it cannot be > ruled out. And what I just read about Rossi and some other prior > measurements, last year, where, it appears, a complex input waveform > was incorrectly analyzed by him to show input power about a third of > real input power -- if that NYTeknik report is accurate -- is leading > me to up the probability of some actual trick. It's still not > probable, in my mind, for entirely different reasons. In terms of "probabilities" I also take into account some of Rossi's public statements : (I don't have all the links at hand ... ) In fairly rapid succession : a )The "Penon" report was issued : <http://coldfusionnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/105322688-Penon4-1.pdf> at the "ECat Convention" (But they miscalculated the output -- they assumed that the raidation in the INNER cavity escaped. But it doesn't -- except for the small holes at the ends it's a perfect black body in thermal equilibrium) b) A correction to exclude the heat from the inner cavity. c) The report from Hydrofusion that a Swedish engineer walked out of the test because Rossi was using a standard meter, and the Triacs require a True RMS meter. (Of course, if that engineer had stuck around for the full test, when the Triacs were on 100%, the Average vs True RMS error would be ZERO. In any case, he could have bought or rented a true RMS meter and run the two in parallel. Or corrected for the error in his report. Ah well. ) d) A statement by Rossi that he re-ran the test with a TRUE RMS meter, and with a VARIAC supplying the heaters. (This is a Rossi statement, but I give it fairly high credibility). Remember that these tests were done without the 35/65 pulsed heating. e) The Levi report and its correction. Not perfect, but MUCH more than nothing. f) The Ericsson response. THEIR "COMSOL" plot proves that there WAS more total energy than Levi measured on the input wires, AND that it must have come from the center of the hotcat, not from the heaters which are near the outside (unless Rossi, who is NOT an electrical engineer, KNEW that he must apply not just DC fake power, but TRIANGULAR fake power). There is NO plausible path for "fake" power to get directly to the center and then make its way back to the outside. See my vortex posts at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg83675.html and http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg83677.html directly addressing the Ericsson curve, and http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg83542.html for my overall thermal simulation (still in progress)
