Hey Jones, you write: >Remember that genius who claimed to have invented an >antigraivty device, but oops, he can't demonstrate it to the >public because he lost it when it went sailing through the >ceiling of his lab into space ? I hope that wan't Wallace, >was it?
That would be JR Searl. Wallace was by all accounts an eccentric but competant worker. There were issues surrounding replication of his work but given the complexity and small magnitude of the effect I wouldn't be discouraged. It may well be that the theoretical work of Fontana ( done to explain Podkletnov's work ) will vindicate Wallace in the end. BTW, what happened to Robert Stirniman? Last time I corresponded with him was years ago, and I don't think his old email works anymore. ??? K.
