1. Energy is only released when hydrinos are formed, not when accumulated hydrinos are returned to "normal".
2. Hydrino production can only be produced rather slowly, only as rapidly as normal H diffuses to the active site and the resulting hydrino diffuses away.
3. According to Mills, hydrinos do not react with oxygen to produce hydrino water.
These facts would seem to make the hydrino explanation unlikely.
Nevertheless, I agree that too much energy seems to have been released to be accounted for by a "normal" H2+O2 reaction.
Ed Storms Jones Beene wrote:
Jed Rothwell writes.
I have to admit, the people pursuing the hydrino
explanation do have a point.
Here is a suggestion (w/ input from Fred Sparber) that might be woth mentioning to Mizuno, or anyone else working with K or Sr or Rb electrolytes, alone or in combinations.
BTW, Rb should be the most active of these, based on the theoretical "fit" but a combination of the three should have synergy becasue of the "spread" of IP energy "holes" based on Table 5.2 in my edition of CQM. The most active combination of electrolytes would most likely be a trade secret, so don't expect any confirmation from Mills.
It is potentially possible to easily detect hydrinos in ongoing electrolytes as they form over time, in a simple procedure, without much expense and without moving the cell. You would only need to shut it off for a few seconds, take your reading and continue.
Assuming that the tighter "orbital" of the hydrino would create a drastically altered magnetic field, and there is every reason to suspect this, then If one were to measure the bulk magnetic field of a hydino-active electrolyte with any magnetometer, especially a "proton precession magnetometer," which can be easily contructed by anyone at minimal cost; and then measure before the electrolysis begins and periodically during electrolysis (there is no need to even remove the reactor, as this can be done 'in situ'... then after a few days of potassium (etc) hydroxide electrolysis, there should be a drastic change in the bulk magnetic field properties of the reactor, IF but only if lots of hydrinos were being created.
http://www.portup.com/~dfount/proton.htm
"In a simple proton precession magnetometer, a bottle of fluid rich in hydrogen atoms, usually distilled water or a hydrocarbon such as kerosene or alcohol, is surrounded by a coil of wire which can be energized by a direct current to produce a strong magnetic field. When the current is shut off, the precessing protons induce a very weak signal into the same coil, which is now connected to a suitable output device. This output circuitry may be a frequency counter calibrated to give a direct readout of of magnetic field strength."
Jones
BTW, if one wished to maximize hydrino "manufacture" then it would seem that a combination of both Rb, K and Sr electrolytes would be an improvement as they cover different IP ranges. Since you need to get to the first stage quickly, I would suggest that half or more of the mole% be Rb hydroxide.
