|
OK revtec, at least I read your posts!
you wrote "The thermal condition of this planet is
set by the output of the sun. Compared to a one or two percent fluctuation
in solar radiation, anything humans can do down here is totally
irrelevant"
The thermal condition of the planet is set by the
output of the sun PLUS the heat "retaining" capacity of the atmosphere and land.
Without the natural greenhouse effect of the atmosphere, Earth would be an ice
planet. This solar output red herring is the latest rhetorical trick of the
global warming deniers. Obviously it has an effect and so does volcano CO2
output - another (earlier) rhetorical trick, also water vapour. THESE are
all irrelevant because they are NATURAL variations we have little or no control
over. If the solar output was dropping and we could predict that there would be
no large scale volcanic outpourings for a century or two then
environmentalists may look kindly on INCREASING our output of CO2 etc to
stabilise things. The point is, the arguments of the global warming deniers are
more or less functionally equivalent to the guy who doesn't switch the
electricity off when he rewires a house because people can get
struck by lightning...
Nick
|
- Re: SOLVING REALLY BIG PROBLEMS Nick Palmer
- Re: SOLVING REALLY BIG PROBLEMS Jones Beene
- Re: SOLVING REALLY BIG PROBLEMS Nick Palmer
- Re: SOLVING REALLY BIG PROBLEMS Jed Rothwell
- [OT]God's Solution Merlyn
- Re: SOLVING REALLY BIG PROBLEMS Frederick Sparber
- Re: Re: SOLVING REALLY BIG PROBLEMS orionworks
- Re: Re: SOLVING REALLY BIG PROBLEMS Frederick Sparber
- Re: SOLVING REALLY BIG PROBLEMS Horace Heffner
- Re: SOLVING REALLY BIG PROBLEMS Jones Beene
- Re: SOLVING REALLY BIG PROBLEMS Taylor J. Smith

