Re: Pyramid water pump

[RC Macaulay]

Leaking pen wrote.. <how...  does that refute darwinian theory?  at the point that humans <took control of the environment, we no longer had to adapt as much to <survive, therefore one WOULDNT assume that we are simply more <intelligent than previous humans, we simply know more. <take your personal biases OUT of a science discussion, please. Leaking pen.. words mean things, there is a difference in meaning between " refute" and the word "contradict" as used in my post. True , this is a science discussion where nimble minds meet to examine and refute. However, when a person like Darwin, that was NOT a scientist passes off religious theory as science as he has done so with help of many that believe in his religion, he represents a contradiction to science for the simple reason that no demonstrable experimental proof can be structured to examine his theory. You must be careful that you discern bias from thoughtful discourse in a science discussion.. You have my permission to wipe the egg from your face. Richard

<<Blank Bkgrd.gif>>