|
I have all that info still on my hard drive... engineered and prototyped a few RMOD things myself. Can't say I got anywhere close to validating any of his claims though. The reason he concentrated on SMOT and abandoned RMOD is the energy source he was trying to plunder is gravity. The effects of gravity are negated (for the most part) in rotary configurations due to centripetal force. ...and to be fair, we are not talking about OU. That's like saying solar cells are OU. Solar cells harvest sunlight. SMOT harvests gravity. At best an RMOD is nothing more than a magnetically powered minto wheel. -john -----Original Message-----
From: Nick Palmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 2:19 PM To: Vortex-L Subject: SMOT John Steck wrote:-
<<Worse yet, he managed to fleece a few of us too (not me so I must temper my indignation).>> Well, he refunded me and even offered to send me A$50 extra for the inconvenience... If Greg is wrong about the SMOT then he is more likely to be deluded rather than an out and out conman. I think anyone should be concentrating on what he originally called the RMOD which he claimed turned for days but eventually suffered bearing failure. He has even uploaded a couple of drawings of this RMOD to his site. |
- RE: SMOT John Steck
- Re: SMOT Stephen A. Lawrence
- Re: Re: SMOT Terry Blanton
- Re: Re: SMOT Terry Blanton
- Re: SMOT Stephen A. Lawrence

