Mike,
Moller assumes ZPE as the energy release mechanism, but the BLP
reaction
could produce the observed results and further experiments are
needed.
I agree that much more experimentation is needed, and that the
results are intertwined at some basic level, but in
Moller/Langmuir there is no loss of H2 due to hydrinos as in
Mills.
This is a big issue. Mills must keep a steady supply of gas
flowing, not with MAHG. It is a huge advantage over Mills to have
a potentially sealed system with no need of continuous hydrogen
flow.
Moller/Langmuir seems to be more of a ZPE pumping action, which is
also consistent with a *temporary hydrino* being in oscillation
mode - BUT which Mills says specifically cannot exist - and Mills
does not believe in ZPE either. So Mills cannot take credit for
this, IMHO, despite the similarity and the UV photons.
Its too bad that Moller can show more in 15 months, publicly at
least, than Mills can in 15 years, as far as an actual complete
system-wide net OU, and in which the testing is performed
independently and with no strings attached (not that Naudin hasn't
made many gaffs in the past).
Mills has far more detailed spectroscopy etc, and claims a much
higher potential gain per atom, but his plasma is too thin, with
the result being that the high gain is not really relevant unless
and until he can show a system-wide net OU like this, where there
is an immediate an obvious path to self-power.
At this point, I would say the ball is in Mills court for a very
public demonstration, if he still has aspirations of being the
seen as the title-holder, or even a contender in Hy-O-U.
Can't you just hear the heartbreak in Marlon's voice ... "I coulda
been a contender... I coulda had class" ...
Mills has plenty of class and tons of smarts, make no mistake
about that...but can he deliver...?
Jones
For the non-cinema addicted, that line was from "On the
Waterfront" mid-fifties...
