Frederick wrote:

>> "Might a prolific electron emitter like Lanthanum Hexaboride or 
>> Cesium Hexaboride serve better?"

Jones wrote:

> This is an interesting observation because - beside indicating 
> that Frederick is a pretty good mind reader - it highlights one of 
> the significant unanswered questions in the MAHG device. That 
> being: Is the effect due to emitted (ballsitic) electrons, (or 
> EVOs) or to a surface effect on the hot tungsten itself.

> As Micael Foster indicates, Langmuir and modern-day followers - 
> would say it is related to a surface effect, but I am not so sure.

> Ironically, since the alternative premise which is my working 
> model does not require actual monatomic hydrogen, but instead 
> relies on a temporarily bare proton, I lean strongly towards the 
> ballistic flux of electrons (EVOs) as being the operative 
> mechanism.

> By ironic, what I am suggesting in this alternative view is that 
> an actual short-lived proton displacement (a geometric 
> displacement of several anstroms) from a neutral or negatively 
> charged H2 ion - can occur within a short time frame BUT with 
> requiring less actual energy input than the normal 4.53 eV which 
> is required for monatomic hydrogen. IOW the normal explanation of 
> monatomic hydrogen formation and recombination will NOT be 
> overunity - and is probably conservative

> The "kicker" is the time frame. The displacement is short-lived in 
> one regard, as the proton returns "home" almost immediately - but 
> OTOH, this time frame is plenty long in terms of the lifetime of 
> virtual Ps in our 3-space - and it is the half-potential 
> (ionization potential) of Ps, the 3.4 eV photon, which is the 
> ultimate souce of the excess energy. And speaking of "broken 
> symmetries" don't forget that IF the Fermi scale is 
> one-dimensional - then "time" is a fiction for that space and does 
> not operate at all as a restraint.

This might seem like a dumb idea, but could such a low work function
heated surface be used to dissociate water vapor?  Even if it isn't
O/U, being able to use heat alone to create hydrogen might be of some
use.

M.


_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!


Reply via email to