[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Terry Blanton
From: Jed Rothwell
That's preposterous. A development of this nature
would be of earthshaking important to every aspect
of physics, science, and technology.
Well, I *did* recommend at least one FCC crystal of
NaCl. ;-)
So, the Palmdale plant parking lot *is* full.
What do you think they build there?
Well, the SR-71 was cancelled quite a while back. What's the
replacement for it?
It's a safe bet there _is_ one, and has been for quite a few years, and
it's faster than the SR-71 was, which means it's mighty fast. But it
sure isn't the TAW-50 described here! :-)
Secret advances in hypersonic flight and scramjets are easy to believe,
because they're incremental. Secret advances in "electrogravitics", to
take one example from the TAW-50 story, are a lot harder to swallow ...
to put it mildly. (Basic problem is that there ain't no such field as
"electrogravitics" in which to have an advance, despite the fact that
you get thousands of hits on it in Google.)
FWIW:
Regarding Dr. Peter Boylan's, PhD, TAW-50 claims.
I met Dr. Boyland back in the mid 1990s at a New Age Convention down in
Nebraska.
[ ... ]
Personally, I don't know who or where Dr. Boylan gets his controversial opinions from. It
always seems to come from some "source" who must always remain anonymous - for
security reasons. A reader can read into that anything they want.
As for me, I am left with the personal theory (one that I can't substantiate)
that Boylan had been played - or deliberately used.
If he accepts information of the sort in the TAW-50 story without
concrete proof -- like, getting to ride in the thing, maybe -- then he's
incredibly gullible, IMHO. Presumably his knowledge of physics and
engineering is far too small to allow him to evaluate the claims he's
passing on, but one would think that would make him all the more
cautious: it obviously makes him very vulnerable to someone playing him
for a fool.
The military always has something they want to hide (and has, at least
since Ceaser's time). To the extent that "disinformation" just
indicates that something is being hidden, it doesn't really tell us
anything we didn't already know.
