----- Original Message ----- From: "Mitchell Swartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Cc: "John Coviello" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 7:06 PM
Subject: Re: CF Suppression?


At 06:41 PM 9/13/2005, you wrote:
From: "Mitchell Swartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cold fusion is now at the engineering stage, well beyond the "basic" research stage. And as such, several devices and modifications of cold fusion can, and will be, patented.

What is even more interesting is that in the years 2003 through 2005, the Patent Office frequently has cited the ramblings of Jed Rothwell and Ed Storms on vortex (along with the plethora of usual anti-cold fusion suspects) to block American cold fusion patents applications.

You can't seriously think that the patent office is blocking cold fusion patents because of anything said on Vortex by Jed and Ed? They've been blocking cold fusion patents for over 16 years now, well before this forum existed. Somebody has to get a European patent or Asian patent and market a cold fusion device. This controversy could end quickly if that happens.


  John:

     I said "cited" which has a clear meaning.

In fact, by relying on such "cherry pickings" and the rants of the other 'usual suspects', it also demonstrates that the Patent Office has deliberately ignored open demonstrations of cold fusion by Prof. John Dash, by Dennis Cravens, and by my group, JET Thermal Products, which demonstrate conclusively that
they have no foundation for their egregious behavior.


In all due respect, that definitely seems like the onus is on the Patent Office not Jed or Ed (in other words it's the Patent Office's problem). Jed and Ed are doing their best to promote their views on cold fusion. If the Patent Office choses to focus on their views to justify their policies and ignore other evidence, such as actual demonstrations of cold fusion, it seems as if it's the Patent Office who isn't doing their job properly and burying their heads in the sand. The question is: Is this deliberate (i.e. suppression)?

Anyone who thinks cold fusion suppression is too far out to even consider. Remember the people who control our government are the same band of Robber Barrons who have taken our nation into a very questionable war in the Middle East for oil These people will stop at nothing to protect their pet industry, the most profitable industry in human history, the oil industry. If they're willing to drag the nation into war and kill thousands for oil, what makes anyone actually think they wouldn't also use the Patent Office as a convient blocking mechanism to keep cold fusion from progession too quickly?

It is up to cold fusion proponents to make an overwhelming case of cold fusion that can no longer be ignored.

Reply via email to