Jed Rothwell wrote: > Harry Veeder wrote: > >>> It is just the opposite. Peter Hagelstein asked us to make it clear that >>> LENR-CANR is the unofficial site. >> >> This is not evident on lenr-canr home page. > > It is too! As I said, every ICCF-10 paper says: > > "This paper was presented at the 10th International Conference on Cold > Fusion. It may be different from the version published by World Scientific, > Inc (2003) in the official Proceedings of the conference." > > How much more evident can we make it?
I was referring to the home page and not to the disclaimers on the papers. > Anyway, that's what Hagelstein asked me to write, and that's what I wrote. > If Swartz has a problem with it, he should talk to Hagelstein, not me. > > Furthermore, where do you find any indication on the site that it is > "official"? We do not say anything like that anywhere. Not a hint of it. We > have links to all of the official sites that I know of, and we had one to > ICCF10.org for as long as it remained active. You ask how much more evident can you make it? State it explicitly on the home page. Harry
