Harry Veeder wrote:
> How much more evident can we make it?
I was referring to the home page and not to the disclaimers on the papers.
Ah. Well. Most people read the papers and skip the site. Anyway, I do not
see anything on the site that says it is official.
You ask how much more evident can you make it?
State it explicitly on the home page.
State what, exactly? What wording do you propose? Where would you put it?
There are millions of web sites about various subjects, and hundreds of
thousands about energy. I do not recall seeing a disclaimer on one that
says it is not an official site, because that is self-evident. Do you see
any disclaimers on Swartz's site? How about Infinite Energy, or
http://www.newenergytimes.com/?
When these other sites declare themselves unofficial (unofficially what, I
do not know) perhaps I will follow suit.
If LENR-CANR said: "The U.S. Department of Energy in cooperation with The
American Nuclear Society presents LENR-CANR.org . . ." that would certainly
look official, and it would be deceptive. It might be fun to add a fake
endorsement supposedly written by Robert Park. ("Authoritative, convincing
and complete . . .") But I see nothing like that.
- Jed
