IF Rossi is developing his home grown command and control system, we won't
see the E-Cat cluster reactor released for another 10 years.

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 4:26 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yeah, and they did not have an internally designed controller in that
> case.  The Iranians purchased a standard system from what I read.  It is
> much easier to monkey around with a controller that anyone can purchase
> than one where you change the software at will.  Rossi apparently is
> developing his own control software.  Do you know otherwise?  Consider the
> case of Linux systems compared to Windows devices.  The very frequent
> updates keep malicious code under control.  The closer you hold the source
> code and version distributions to your chest, the more difficult it becomes
> for bad guys to interfere.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: Axil Axil <[email protected]>
> To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 4:13 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:more energy in disputes than from cells
>
>  The Iranians lost control of their centrifuges, and they were not on the
> internet. The infection came in on a memory stick.
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 4:08 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> You assume that these ECAT systems must be connected to the Internet.
>> If that connection is too dangerous then it should not be standard until
>> the vulnerabilities are resolved.  Of course it is *modern* to monitor
>> and control things by connection to the internet, but that is not the only
>> choice.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
>>
>>  -----Original Message-----
>> From: Axil Axil <[email protected]>
>> To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
>>  Sent: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 3:35 pm
>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:more energy in disputes than from cells
>>
>>    How will Russia kept their oil and gas products running in the face
>> of Rossi's E-Cat challenge? Here's how.
>>
>>  SCADA Strangelove: Zero-days & hacking for full remote control
>>
>> Speaking of critical SCADA systems online and the risks to them…after
>> finding more than 60,000 exposed control systems online, two Russian
>> security researchers found vulnerabilities that could be exploited to take
>> “full control of systems running energy, chemical and transportation
>> systems.”
>>
>> At the Chaos Communication Congress, 30C3, Positive Research chief
>> technology officer Sergey Gordeychik and consultant Gleb Gritsai said they
>> demonstrated “how to get full control of industrial infrastructure” to the
>> energy, oil and gas, chemical and transportation sectors. “The
>> vulnerabilities,” according to the Australian IT News, “existed in the way
>> passwords were encrypted and stored in the software's Project database and
>> allowed attackers to gain full access to Programmable Logic Controllers
>> (PLCs) using attacks described as dangerous and easy to launch.”
>>
>> They probed and found holes in “popular and high-end ICS and supervisory
>> control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems used to control everything
>> from home solar panel installations to critical national infrastructure.”
>> There are also numerous vulnerabilities in “home systems -- exposed to the
>> public internet and at risk of attack.”
>>
>> In one case, the researchers responsibly disclosed a “vulnerability in
>> the cloud SCADA platform Daq Connect which allowed attackers running a
>> demonstration kiosk to access other customer installations." The vendor's
>> totally unhelpful response was to tell the researchers “to simply 'not do'
>> the attacks.”
>>
>> The SCADA Strangelove project has identified more than 150 zero-day
>> vulnerabilities in SCADA, ICS and PLCs, with five percent of those being
>> “dangerous remote code execution holes.” At 30C3, they released an updated
>> version of THC-Hydra, “a password-cracking tool that targeted the
>> vulnerability in Siemens PLC S-300 devices,” and a “Pretty Shiny Sparkly
>> ICS/SCADA/PLC Cheat Sheet,” identifying almost 600 ICS, PLC and SCADA
>> systems, so you too can “become a real SCADA Hacker.”
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>  Rossi has publicly stated that he is using over 100 computers to
>>> implement his latest control stratagem. From this meager bit of information
>>> we can deduce fairly much what is going on with the 1 megawatt cluster
>>> E-Cat reactor. That number of computers means he is using a SCADA system to
>>> do the command and control function to keep his creation in line.
>>>  The term SCADA (supervisory control and data acquisition) usually
>>> refers to a centralized system which monitors and controls the industrial
>>> infrastructure of entire sites, or complexes of systems spread out over
>>> large areas (anything from an industrial plant to a nation). Most localized
>>> control actions are performed automatically by Remote Terminal Unit (RTU)s
>>> or by Programmable Logic Controller (PLC)s. These are computer boards which
>>> are controlled by a low level microcomputer usually housed in a rack
>>> mounted enclosure using a full duplex bus structure to communicate with a
>>> master control station(MCS). The MCS is a custom coded PC that hosts the
>>> bus network and provides a graphical user interface to depict the
>>> operational parameters and status of all the E-Cats. In a high availability
>>> application, the MCD runs in a ghosted mode with a hot backup PC.
>>>
>>>  The cost of such a system(a high quality implementation) is
>>> substantial. This digital Command and Control(C&C) will comprise a large
>>> fraction of the cost of Rossi's 1 megawatt plant. Even the best of such
>>> systems is prone to bugs, out of profile behavior and hacking attacks.
>>> Usually industrial customers will want to integrate the E-Cat cluster
>>> reactor into their factory wide SCADA C&C system.
>>>
>>>  In my opinion, Rossi and Industrial heat have made a mistake in
>>> judgment on this reactor design decision. A simplified fail safe (as in a
>>> nuclear reactor) analog based control system is best suited to the 1 MW
>>> E-Cat cluster reactor.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear Friends,
>>>>
>>>>  when the New Paradigm of LENR will
>>>> arrive, remember me for this too:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/12/daily-shared-lenr-discoveries-december_9.html
>>>>
>>>>  It is the daily info here...more daily than info this time.
>>>>  Peter
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>> Dr. Peter Gluck
>>>> Cluj, Romania
>>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to