Jones-- I think the item I just copied regarding the Woods-Saxon potential indicates for Hydrogen, Z=1, that Frank is closer to the listed radius of 1.23 fm than you are at your .866 fm. I think your radius is a "rms charge radius". You and Frank may be talking about different dimensions of a nucleus. Yours clearly only applies to a single proton as I understand it and is not a radius associated with the extent of the strong nuclear force.
Correct me if I am wrong. Bob Cook ----- Original Message ----- From: Jones Beene To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2014 12:04 PM Subject: RE: [Vo]:1995- CETI 1kW reacto claim . fraud or not? Sorry Frank, but you are just as wrong now as you were then. http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?rp|search_for=proton+radius ----- Original Message ----- From: Frank Znidarsic There were those that stated that my analysis was wrong because the wrong numbers came out of it. Our Jones Beene was one of them. He said the radius of a nucleon was .866 fm not 1.36 fm. They bashed me badly
