----- Original Message ----- From: Frank Znidarsic To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2014 10:09 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:1995- CETI 1kW reacto claim . fraud or not?
I observed the velocity of one million meters per second at the CETI demo. I felt that it was important. At first, as an Electrical Engineer, I produced this velocity in terms of electrical units. I had a quantum of capacitance and units of inductance. After taking some physics training, I realized that nobody really understood this. So, I converted the units into mechanical terms. Out came an elastic constant wave numbers. The new numbers are listed below to 6 digits. Fm = 29.0535 Newtons, The electron’s force maximum K-e = 29.0535/r Newtons/meter, The elastic constant of the electron Kf = 1.35969 x 10-15 meters , The nuclear spacing rp = 1.40879 x 10-15 meters, The maximum range of the strong force. 2rp = 2.81794 x 10-15 meters, The classical radius of the electron Sn = 1,093,850 meters per sec., The speed of sound in the nucleus There were those that stated that my analysis was wrong because the wrong numbers came out of it. Our Jones Bennie was one of them. He said the radius of a nucleon was .866 fm not 1.36 fm. They bashed me badly. I knew I was correct because so much came out of the analysis, like the energy levels of the atoms and the Compton frequency of the electron. A typical bashing is listed below. http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread628722/pg1 My numbers have proven correct. The 1.36 fm dimension was correct. It came out of the analysis and I did not know it before hand. I now know that my pundents were clueless. http://applet-magic.com/He4nuclide.htm The 1.41 fm dimension was correct. It has recently been discovered that 1.401 fm is the range of the strong nuclear force based of the mass the neutral pion. It's in: "Neutrons, Nuclei and Matter: An Exploration of the Physics of Slow Neutrons" (Dover Books on Physics) I was told that you have nothing compared to the beauty of the Widdom Larson and many others. Did they produce the entire quantum condition as a result of there analysis? It happened many times. A simple analysis based on the CETI observation has produced correct results that were persevered wrong and later proven correct. I believe that the still unknown result of how to control all of the natural forces will also prove to be correct. Frank Znidarsic
