Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected]> wrote:

I'm assuming this is just nonsense but some of the patho-skeptics are
> claiming that the russian report would have to produce dry steam in order
> to reach the energy levels he's claiming.
>

If you assume the results are in error, they would have to be wet steam
sometimes and dry steam at other times, because the apparent excess heat
varies. That is highly unlikely.

There is no reason to think this is anything but ordinary dry steam. The
vent is well above the water level, at the top of the reactor. Drops of
water will not escape.



> While I'm still very skeptical, and his COP numbers have already been
> proven to be nonsense . . .
>

No, they have not. This is your imagination.

- Jed

Reply via email to