Thanks chem e .. Very informative. On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 9:58 AM, ChemE Stewart <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Steam Quality1000.950.90.850.8Deg C 1,290 1,290 > 1,290 1,290 1,290min4040404040W498498498498498J > (Elec) 1,195,200 1,195,200 1,195,200 1,195,200 > 1,195,200kg Water (Evap) 1.21.141.0260.87210.69768J (Evap) 2,712,000 > 2,576,400 2,318,760 1,970,946 1,576,757Heat Loss (W) > 155 155 155 155 > 155Heat Loss (J) 372,000 372,000 372,000 > 372,000 372,000Total J Produced 3,084,000 2,948,400 > 2,690,760 2,342,946 1,948,757COP2.582.472.251.961.63 > Unless a visble amount of carryover, steam in contact with water should be > >= 95% quality > > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> I'm assuming this is just nonsense but some of the patho-skeptics are >> claiming that the russian report would have to produce dry steam in order >> to reach the energy levels he's claiming. >> >> While I'm still very skeptical, and his COP numbers have already been >> proven to be nonsense, I would assume such a simple issues as this would >> have been pointed out already by the serious minds on this list. >> > >
