My argument though would be that maybe rather than having zero temperature, maybe quantum effects occurs due to enhancing the power of the quantum vacuum.
Consider that what we have here is in a sense a signal from the quantum and noise from temperature. If we lower the temperature, the noise is reduced to the point that the signal allows something extraordinary. But what if the signal is being increased? If the energy of the quantum vacuum is being enhanced sufficiently, then the signal might overpower the temperature noise even at very high temperatures. IMO this is far more likely since I know that such conditioning of the vacuum is possible. John On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 8:13 AM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: > You ask an interesting question about temperature due to being in an > excited state for an individual atom. I suppose it might be defined in > that manner as including both motion and excess stored energy, but most of > the time when I consider temperature it is a result of the relative motion > of the atoms according to our frame of reference. > > If the atoms are in the form of hydrogen that has been ionized then the > individual protons would come to rest relative to each other > periodically. Of course protons are tiny objects relative to the cavities > that Mark is considering and plenty of them could be contained within one. > They would likely repel each other due to having the same positive charge > which would allow the storage of energy among the group. This energy > storage would be comparable to energy stored within a spring since it > attempts to force the protons apart. > > The real questions are how close do the protons need to be to each other > and for how long of a time frame before a reaction takes place. If you > have 4 protons at rest and close together does that encourage a BEC type > of reaction? I believe that this is what Mark is thinking, but I may have > not understand him well. > > I still tend to believe that some form of magnetic coupling is the key to > LENR, perhaps involving the spins of the particles. So far, I have not > seen adequate evidence that BEC reactions have anything to do with LENR. I > hope that the mechanism will be understood soon as a consequence of the > recent increased replication activity. > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Tue, Dec 30, 2014 2:04 am > Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:FYI: Strong light–matter coupling in > two-dimensional atomic crystals > > Can an atom have a temperature between its different parts? > > Is an atom that is excited and about to emit a photon not quite hot? > > > > On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 6:09 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> > wrote: > >> I have considered what you are saying as being normal Mark. Relative >> motion of an atom to itself is zero, so it is at zero kelvin as far as it >> knows. When a second atom is added to the void, it becomes more >> complicated but the relative motion of the two must become zero many times >> per second as they collide and rebound within your assumed cavity. During >> these brief intervals we have two atoms that are at zero Kelvin from their >> reference frame. As you add more and more atoms to the mix the amount of >> time during which zero relative motion exists between them becomes smaller >> and less likely, but does occur. >> >> As long as you keep the number of atoms relatively small that are >> required to react in the process of your choice, it will have an >> opportunity to happen many times per second inside each cavity. Multiply >> that number by the number of possible active cavities within a large object >> and you get an enormous number of active sites that have the potential to >> react. >> >> If only 4 atoms are required at zero Kelvin in order to react as you may >> be considering, it seems obvious that this will occur so often that a large >> amount of heat will be released by a system of that type. When you realize >> that it seems to be very difficult to achieve an LENR device that generates >> lots of heat I suspect that the number of reacting atoms confined within >> the cavity is quite a bit greater than 4. How many do you believe are >> required in order to combine and in what form is the ash? >> >> On the other hand, if a reaction is virtually guaranteed once a modest >> number of atoms becomes confined inside the void, then the limiting factor >> might be that it becomes impossible to confine the required number under >> most conditions. If this situation is the limiting factor, then a higher >> temperature could well allow more atoms of the reactants to enter into a >> void of the necessary type as more space become available when the cavity >> walls open with additional motion. >> >> I am not convinced that this type of reaction is the cause of LENR, but >> at least it should be given proper consideration. >> >> Dave >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: MarkI-ZeroPoint <zeropo...@charter.net> >> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >> Sent: Mon, Dec 29, 2014 10:54 pm >> Subject: [Vo]:FYI: Strong light–matter coupling in two-dimensional atomic >> crystals >> >> FYI: >> >> Article being referenced is at the bottom, however, I wanted to toss >> something out to The Collective first… >> >> One of the things that caught my eye in the article is the ‘room >> temperature’ condition… >> >> As we all know, atoms at room temp are vibrating like crazy since they >> contain the equivalent of 273degC of energy above their lowest state. >> Thus, ‘coherent’ states in condensed matter above absolute zero is almost >> never seen. The article’s experiment was done in material at room temp, so >> the observed behavior is a bit of a surprise. Perhaps what they have not >> yet thought about is that the ‘microcavities’ have no temperature, as I >> will explain below. >> >> This ties in with a point I tried to explain to Dr. Storms, and although >> I think he realizes my point had merit, he glossed right over it and went >> off on a different tangent. This was in a vortex discussion about 9 to 12 >> months ago. The point is this: >> >> The ‘temperature’ inside a ‘void’ in a crystal lattice is most likely >> that of the vacuum of space; i.e, absolute zero, or very close to it. >> Because, temperature is nothing more than excess energy imparted to atoms >> from neighboring atoms; atoms have temperature; space/vacuum does not. >> Without atoms (physical matter), you have no temperature. In a lattice >> void, if it is large enough (whatever that dimension is), there is NO >> ‘temperature’ inside since the void contains no atoms. If an atom diffuses >> into that void, it enters with whatever energy it had when it entered, so >> it has a temperature. At this time, I have not heard any discussion as to >> whether the atoms which make up the walls of the void shed IR photons which >> could get absorbed by an atom in the void and increase its temperature, >> however, would that atom want to immediately shed that photon to get back >> to its lowest energy level??? So voids in crystals likely provide an ideal >> environment for the formation of BECs. >> >> -mark iverson >> >> ARTICLE BEING REFERENCED >> >> Strong light–matter coupling in two-dimensional atomic crystals >> http://www.nature.com/nphoton/journal/v9/n1/full/nphoton.2014.304.html >> >> Abstract >> “Two-dimensional atomic crystals of graphene, as well as transition-metal >> dichalcogenides, have emerged as a class of materials that demonstrate >> strong interaction with light. This interaction can be further controlled >> by embedding such materials into optical *microcavities*. When the >> interaction rate is engineered to be faster than dissipation from the light >> and matter entities, one reaches the ‘strong coupling’ regime. This results >> in the formation of half-light, half-matter bosonic quasiparticles called >> *microcavity >> polaritons*. Here, we report evidence of strong light–matter coupling >> and the formation of microcavity polaritons in a two-dimensional atomic >> crystal of molybdenum disulphide (MoS2) embedded inside a dielectric >> microcavity at *room temperature*. A Rabi splitting of 46 ± 3 meV is >> observed in angle-resolved reflectivity and photoluminescence spectra due >> to coupling between the two-dimensional excitons and the cavity photons. >> Realizing strong coupling at room temperature in two-dimensional materials >> that offer a disorder-free potential landscape provides an attractive route >> for the development of practical polaritonic devices.” >> >> > >
