If money was no object, I would be interested in two tests to be run on a successful dog bone reactor.
Test 1 Take a complete temperature based spectral analisys of the light an RF coming from the dog bone in successful operation including emission and absorption lines Test 2 After a successful run of one month in duration, develop a elemental fine grained migration and transmutation analysis of the ENTIRE structure of the dog bone reactor: say on a 10 micron granularity to see where the nuclear active sites are located and how elements move through the grain structure of the alumina.. On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > The “dogbone” seems like a relatively simple reactor, but it could be > rather complex in operation if it depends on SPP formation and positive > feedback. SPP would be expected to form in two main places – the interface > of the resistance wire with ceramic outside the tube, or also on the > interior wall of the tube – but only if that wall is electrically > conductive AND is carrying current - in the presence of photon flux from > the heating wire. (The current would be AC, induced from the resistance > wire). In fact, the outer location could be powering the interior location > with SPP and each having positive feedback to the other. > > > > The role of lithium-aluminum (besides being the hydrogen source, as a > hydride) could be twofold, in the Parkhomov reactor. It could be a nuclear > reactant, but proof of that awaits isotope analysis. It could also be the > needed electrical conductor – if it is deposited in the correct thickness. > > > > In short, there could be evidence of nuclear reactions of lithium and > hydrogen - or not. In hot fusion, it is known that hydrogen (as opposed to > deuterium) does not readily react with lithium, and that would suggest that > lithium would play the other critical role. > > > > That critical role would be as a conductive thin film (deposited as an > alloy with aluminum) on the interior wall of the tube. The high vapor > pressure of molten LiAl alloy suggests that it could be deposited correctly > in thickness of tens of nm. It that is true, then the main function of > lithium alloy could be to promote the Kretschmann geometry for SPP > optimization. The Kretschmann geometry requires a thin film of conductor > which will transmit light. A thickness of 50 nm works for gold. > > > > http://www.doctorlighthouse.com/kretschmanngeome.html > > > > This could be a reason why adding more LiAlH4 (more than 1/10 gram) could > be counterproductive and probably would quench the reaction. > > > > There is enough hydrogen in the tenth gram to provide about a > megawatt-hour of thermal energy when it is reduced to the DDL so we do not > need more hydrogen. And if SPP is the mechanism that reduces hydrogen to > DDL, then we do not need more lithium aluminum - since the deposit would be > too thick. > > > > Prediction for Parkhomov: if a more sensitive GM meter can be obtained to > look for soft x-rays in the range of 3.6 keV – they will be found. The > normal meter will miss this radiation spectrum. > > > > >
