Dear Jed,

in your report you write:













*The temperature rose for 1.5 hours until it stabilized 0.6°Cabove room
temperature (Fig. 19.) It stabilized because heat losses equal the power
from thepump. In other words, with low input power after 1.5 hours, this
system acts as an isoperiboliccalorimeter. Based on the cooling curve after
the ambient temperature fell during the night, this0. 6°C difference
indicates that the pump delivers only ~0.4 W of heat to the circulating
water.More to the point, with this method of adiabatic calorimetry the
0.6°C temperature increaseover ambient is not included in the calculation
of excess heat, because the pump is left on all thetime, and it always does
the same amount of work, so the temperature is always 0.6°C aboveambient.
To be specific, with this method, the starting water temperature is
subtracted from theending water temperature, and the starting temperature
is already 0.6°C warmer than ambient.With other methods of calorimetry,
heat is measured by comparing the reactor temperature toambient. With these
methods, heat from the pump has to be subtracted from the total, or it
willbe mistaken for excess heat.*

I could say that this is false but I will be fair and I will say that this
is not true. From the missing file (Mizuno's data) we get the following
situation for the difference between water and ambient temperature

(4h 2.5°C) (5h 2.9°C) (6h 3.1°C) (7h 3.2°C) (8h 3.2°C) (9h 3.2°C) (10h
3.1°C) (11h 3.1°C) (12h 3.1°C) (13h 3.0°C)
(14h 2.9°C) (15h 2.8°C) (16h 2.7°C) (17h 2.6°C) (18h 2.5°C)

were the temperatures are taken at the beginning of the hour.

How do you explain this?

Thanks


2015-01-10 17:50 GMT+01:00 Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>:

> I wrote:
>
>
>> Where do you see that? At what hour? At hour 2.2 it reaches the peak. The
>> water temperature is 23.3°C and ambient is 22.8°C.
>>
>
> I meant to say: At hour 1.4 it reaches the peak. Taking the value at 2.2
> hours, the water temperature is 23.3°C and ambient is 22.8°C.
>
> At 2.2 hours the numbers are stable.
>
> I refer to Fig. 19 on p. 25 here:
>
> http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJreportonmi.pdf
>
> - Jed
>
>

Reply via email to