<[email protected]> wrote:
> BTW, formation of 1 molecule of Hydrogen gas from atomic Hydrogen yields > 4.519 > eV per H2 molecule. > > (Of course there is no way to store atomic H.) > That is my point about Piantelli's statement. Okay, there may be moments when individual molecules or atoms produce more energy than the formation of H2O does. Such as the formation of atomic H. But you can't store atomic H. The stuff immediately reforms into H2. Or such as ionization -- one of the things Piantelli listed. Something has to ionize the ion, giving it a bunch of electrons, which takes energy. They don't stay ionized. The overall system does not produce energy, and it cannot store a lot of energy. If you can find a way to super-ionize hydrogen -- making it super-duper-capacitor I suppose -- that would be great. As I said, if you could store more energy than H2 + O2 fuel produces, NASA and many others would be thrilled. But you can't. Piantelli can't. . . . We know this is not what cold fusion does because it has produced 100,000 times more than any conceivable combination of short term and long temp chemical storage mechanisms. (Electron bond mechanisms.) - Jed
