On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> If he or anyone else can show a way to store more energy per gram than O2 > - H2 fuel, they will revolutionize energy technology. This would be a > tremendous breakthrough. I am confident he has not found this. > > Even as a storage medium, and not a primary source of energy, this would > be revolutionary, and very useful. > Energy storage and concentration is what LENR is all about. A good test to determine who is correct on this issue is to design an experiment to see how much heat energy can be loaded into a Dog Bone to see when this heat energy is stored and when is it released. Your right...a Dog Bone could make a great super capacitor converting heat energy into x-rays. > > >> The ionization process inside the Ni/H reactor is all pervasive and is >> not limited to just hydrogen. >> > It makes no difference. Chemical bonds do not survive storing more than ~4 > eV per atom by any method. No chemical, electrochemical or battery can do > this. Most batteries are orders of magnitude below this. > > If Piantelli thinks there is a slightest possibility that the energy > releases observed in cold fusion, such as 100 eV/atom or 100,000 eV/atom, > might have a conventional chemical explanation, or might be caused by > ionization, he does not understand the fundamentals. I hope he does not > think that, and this was some sort of misunderstanding. > > > > Energy storage in LENR is not based on chemistry. On the contrary is based on Light matter entanglement. Electron, holes and infrared photons become entangled at x-ray photon energies. > > The energy for this ionization comes from the heat that initiates the LENR > reaction during reaction startup. The dipole vibration starts out weakly > across a broad front of many elements and compounds but it accumulates over > the hours . . . > It cannot "accumulate." There is no mechanism that would allow it to > accumulate or be stored. > The mechanism is called Fano resonance and the storage mechanism is called SPP soliton. > There are no supercapacitors that store far more energy per gram than > chemical fuel. At best, they will eventually approach the storage > capabilities of H2 + O2. Actually, in the atmosphere, you can get by with > H2 only, and use O2 from the atmosphere. This is why H2 for fuel cells and > airplanes engine fuel has the best ratio of energy to mass now, and the > best there ever will be. We are not going to find anything lighter. > > Both photons and SPPs can produce a LASER beam. Such beams are produced by the accumulation of energy as Light or a Light/matter mixture which has no weight or for SPPs the mass of a neutrino. Yet this concentrated EMF energy storage media can shoot down the heaviest of airplanes.
