I can add that chart. That is actually the way I plot it for calculating excess power, but it's less intuitive in a presentation.
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:20 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > Not exactly. The slope of the input power will become lower as the > temperature is increased in the chart that I use. If this slope is not > reduced as the temperature rises then there is little positive thermal > feedback present. And, if the slope enters into a negative region as > temperature rises the device will continue to heat up until it either self > destructs or the careful geometry of the design begins to take more heat > power away from the system than is added by the core. The new high > temperature safe operating region exhibits a positive slope similar to what > is seen below the negative slope threshold temperature. > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jones Beene <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Mon, Feb 9, 2015 12:55 pm > Subject: RE: [Vo]:Titanium as hydrogen carrier in Improved experiment > > Isn’t chart D giving you that ? > > > > *From:* David Roberson > > I would like to see the curve of input power versus temperature plotted. > The input power needs to appear along the Y-axis and the temperature along > the X-axis. This type of curve tells very much about how the device will > behave. It can demonstrate when the COP will become large and indicate > the potential for runaway conditions. > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jones Beene <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Mon, Feb 9, 2015 12:21 pm > Subject: [Vo]:Titanium as hydrogen carrier in Improved experiment > Jack Cole has made progress in his continuing effort to reach higher > COP at lower temperature in a ceramic cell of the type used by Parkhomov > and Rossi. > > http://www.lenr-coldfusion.com/2015/02/09/excess-heating-alternative-hydrogen-source/ > The results are improved but still only slightly gainful –not far enough > above the noise level to expect others to drop everything and pay attention, > yet > … but heck, look at it this way – the delta-t gain is improved by about > 50% over the previous iteration - and at that rate of improvement, it > will not take long. A goal of COP=1.5 is in range with only a few more > changes. > In fact, Jack held back on the hydrogen carrier (TiH2) due to the MFMP > “explosion” > and therein is an obvious way to look for further improvement. > The most notable feature is that gain was seen at very modest P-in which > is due in part to thermal insulation. > Jones > PS – there is a paper in the LENR library by Dash et al where the > authors state that titanium is more active for LENR than palladium. > Therefore using TiH2 to carry hydrogen, while retaining lithium in a much > safer > form is almost a no-brainer. >
