I have added it now at the end of the post. On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:31 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Jones, you are confusing me! I am recovering from a bad case of Norovirus > today that is leaving my brain scrambled. If the axis of that curve are > adjusted properly then it will become the correct one. The input power > needs to be along the Y-axis, while the temperature should appear along the > X-axis. A quick look at the present curve does not show the slope tending > in the correct direction. Perhaps as he works on the design the proper > indication will begin to appear. And, obviously, the amount of positive > feedback present has a major effect upon visual display of the graph. > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jones Beene <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Mon, Feb 9, 2015 1:03 pm > Subject: RE: [Vo]:Titanium as hydrogen carrier in Improved experiment > > Make that Chart C > > > *From:* David Roberson > > I would like to see the curve of input power versus temperature plotted. > The input power needs to appear along the Y-axis and the temperature along > the X-axis. This type of curve tells very much about how the device will > behave. It can demonstrate when the COP will become large and indicate > the potential for runaway conditions. > > Dave > > > Jack Cole has made progress in his continuing effort to reach higher > COP at lower temperature in a ceramic cell of the type used by Parkhomov > and Rossi. > > http://www.lenr-coldfusion.com/2015/02/09/excess-heating-alternative-hydrogen-source/ > The results are improved but still only slightly gainful –not far enough > above the noise level to expect others to drop everything and pay attention, > yet > … but heck, look at it this way – the delta-t gain is improved by about > 50% over the previous iteration - and at that rate of improvement, it > will not take long. A goal of COP=1.5 is in range with only a few more > changes. > In fact, Jack held back on the hydrogen carrier (TiH2) due to the MFMP > “explosion” > and therein is an obvious way to look for further improvement. > The most notable feature is that gain was seen at very modest P-in which > is due in part to thermal insulation. > Jones > PS – there is a paper in the LENR library by Dash et al where the > authors state that titanium is more active for LENR than palladium. > Therefore using TiH2 to carry hydrogen, while retaining lithium in a much > safer > form is almost a no-brainer. >
