Couple of more details of interest: the hydrogen release of TiH2 starts at 350 
C but the compound is a poor storage material for hydrogen, as a general rule, 
since the last hydrogen will not be removed easily. However… hydrogen transport 
could be less important than “participation” in the reaction …  Here is an old 
paper which indicates that titanium itself is very active for LENR, so it would 
be the ideal carrier for hydrogen which also participates in the gain. 

 

http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/DashJexcessheat.pdf

 

Simply use more of it. It is inexpensive. The magnitude of excess heat is said 
in the paper above to be greater for titanium than for palladium !

 

 

From: David Roberson 

 

That is good Jack.  Perhaps it is less intuitive but it captures the behavior 
of these types of devices very well.  If the slope enters a negative region 
then the positive thermal feedback wins the battle and the device heats up 
rapidly.  The curve also will indicate whether or not a second high temperature 
region of stable operation is present.

Your present design would be classified as a type 1 system in my analysis since 
the slope of that curve never enters into a negative region.  Once you push it 
into a type 2 or 3 system the fireworks will begin.  That is where Dr. 
Parkhomov is operating with his latest version that is somewhat insulated.  It 
is going to take a lot of effort and good design for him to keep these stable.

I modeled this curve according to the behavior of a tunnel diode.  Since the 
voltage is analogous to the temperature and the power input analogous to the 
current it makes perfect sense.  You can determine how to design tunnel diode 
oscillators or switches from that basic curve.  I see the same thing happening 
with these LENR devices.  I also realize excellent correlation to my previous 
computer models.

Dave

 

 

 

Reply via email to