From: [email protected]
Ø the statement I refer to were not in the report, but were specific answer given later. Yes that is a major problem – a recollection coming months later from the memory of an embarrassed scientist who had already been caught napping on the job – is essentially not worth very much, comparatively. Ø Ø in fact the statement in the report was ambiguous. Sorry, but there is nothing ambiguous in Levi stating that Rossi intervened remove the powder charge. How much clearer can one get? … and this is the official report – not an exculpatory memory coming months later. Jones
