this does not change the fact that Industrial Heat gave a reactor with freedom to test anything on it. This happened also in Ferrara.
this alone rule out fraud. once you rule out fraud on the calorimetry, you know that at least IH think it's reactor works. The hypothesis og isotope manipulation is not credible, both because it was too much to look real (really challenging), and because it is not important compared to the calorimetry now that the physicist made mistake or that the reactor was not hot enough or was broken is another story... clearly possible. what give me hope is that the calibration at 450C matched the model, ruling out the 0.90 emissivity theory... 2015-03-07 19:43 GMT+01:00 Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net>: > *From:* alain.coetm...@gmail.com > > > > Ø the statement I refer to were not in the report, but were specific > answer given later. > > > > Yes that is a major problem – a recollection coming months later from the > memory of an embarrassed scientist who had already been caught napping on > the job – is essentially not worth very much, comparatively. > > > > Ø > > Ø in fact the statement in the report was ambiguous. > > > > Sorry, but there is nothing ambiguous in Levi stating that Rossi > intervened remove the powder charge. > > > > How much clearer can one get? … and this is the official report – not an > exculpatory memory coming months later. > > > > Jones > > >
