If you admit that the law of trajectory of planet was initiated by a mystic astrology fan , Keppler. that an integrist opposed to moder mathematic (differential calculus), defending old greek math (geometry), proposed the best theory, when he was not doing fringe hopeless nuclear chemistry (sorry it was not LENR), then exploitingh his succes to oppose achromatic lens technology.
If you admit that courageous passionate bicycle entrepreneurs invented airplane and cinema. If you admit that a revolution in cristallography was done by an insulted quasi-scientists, insulted by a Nobel of Chemistry, who was insulted himself. This is just normal science, I mean non-normal science as Kuhn says. the one that breaks the box. Anyway Alexander have to improve his calorimetry, or nobody will believe his result. He is far from the level of Fleischmann or McKubre calorimetry. 2015-03-20 5:22 GMT+01:00 Eric Walker <[email protected]>: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected] > > wrote: > > .. that wants the replication to be real so that the global energy / >> scientific revolution starts in some old fringe Russian scientist's living >> room?? >> > > Personally, I could not think of a more just reward to the physics > establishment for its intransigence than for LENR to make big news as the > result of an aging Russian scientist replicating in his apartment a device > that was invented by a petulant Italian inventor with a colorful past. I > would be very happy if things end up playing out this way, and am hoping > they do. It would prove that karma exists, and the physics establishment > would have to suffer through the consequences. > > I think the jury is still out as to whether Parkhomov is really seeing > something, although I am cautiously optimistic. > > Eric > >
