> First of all, Kim’s main source is Sterling Allan. > Are you saying that Dr. Kim as belittled himself for working with Sterling Allan?
> Never does Kim say that he performed the experiment or saw the magnetic > results for himself. > How would Kim get the idea about Bosenova, if he did not see it. Bosenova seems to be a major reaction path in hid BEC theory and the primacy way to return energy to the reactor. > This paper is theoretical, hearsay, and beyond poor. It is an > embarrassment to Purdue, if nothing else. > > > > Are you saying that HHO is not a LENR field and not deserving of a theory of experiment? > As I recall - Alain, who posts here often first reported that Kim did not > actually participate in the DGT experiment – and he may provide the > reference but if not - some of it is here: > > > > http://revolution-green.com/lenr-defkalion-bad-measurements/ > This reference is a criticism of a demo that DGT ran. Not a repudiation of their technology. It certainly was a misdirection of my request for a reference about the character of Kim's experimental observations. Time will tell if the info that DGT and Kim provided in the ICCF 18 presentation was factual or not. > > > > > *From:* Axil Axil > > > > > http://www.physics.purdue.edu/people/faculty/publications/yekim/O-fusion.pdf > > > > *Purdue Nuclear and Many-Body Theory Group (PNMBTG) * > > *Preprint- PNMBTG-05-2014 (May 2014) * > > In the above reference, Dr Kim explains his theory with regards to > Bosenova. > > Please supply a reference for your assertion that Dr. Kim did not observe > the Bosenova in an experiment. Having given the subject a theoretical > foundation, this hearsay assertion of the subject is hard to believe. > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > > *From:* Axil Axil . > > Ø But Dr Kim saw in DGT experiments magnetic solitons exploding in > a Bosenova. > > No he didn’t. How many times do we have to correct the record on this? > > In Dr. Y. E. Kim's ICCF-18 presentation, the only time his bizarre > hypothesis is mentioned - Kim said that he did not personally measure the > magnetic field and had little direct information on it. Kim said that > DGT measured the field, and he assumed their claim was accurate. > > Yet we know from hindsight that DGT was reporting one lie after another > and has gone belly up. Nothing coming from that work has credibility and > instead has significant likelihood of leading experimenters down the > wrong path. > > >
