Jones--
Look at the physics of nuclear magnetic resonance. Spin energy states are
changed in nuclei with the introduction of a magnetic field and a EM photon.
This is very well known and commonly used theory and technology. There is a
swapping of energy between the magnetic field and the nuclei involved in the
spin states of that nuclei. In general in commercial NMR the energies are
small, one spin quanta for example. However, there is no reason why higher
spin quanta cannot be involved, with many particles of the nano coherent
systems accepting small quanta, all adding up to MEV'S of accepted
energy for any given reaction. Many reactions in many nano systems add up
to your kilowatt criteria. In fact such a distributed energy production
over a significant volume of nano systems is required to keep destruction of
the nano systems at bay. I would add that energetic particles that would
destroy a nano system will not work for long.
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jones Beene" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2015 9:20 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Probability Enhancement via SPP
Bob,
Spin could be heavily involved, as would be expected with SPP - but there
is
no valid physical model for complete conversion of kilowatts of power into
only spin, as you seem to suggest. If there was, then that avenue is
certainly more elegant. Since we have no guidance from Physics for
complete
conversion to spin - I am trying to fit this phenomenon into a framework
where there is an accepted model (even if not widely known).
At the same time, good evidence is turning up that there is a large QM
anomaly for lithium-6 leading to fusion with the ash consisting solely of
helium. These are fast particles, even if less energetic than expected in
hot fusion, and that amount of kinetic energy cannot easily show up as
only
spin.
http://xxx.tau.ac.il/pdf/1503.05266.pdf
The main problem being one of a complete absence of bremsstrahlung...
(there
are no gammas from the start in the reaction, so we do not have to deal
with
that problem). This is a bit different from Hagelstein's hypothesis, where
he is struggling to downshift gammas to phonon vibrations - where the
coupling spans 9 orders of magnitude with complete certainty and no
leakage.
With a coherent S-matrix of superradiant coherent IR photons, the problem
is
reduced to 4 orders of magnitude, where physical evidence does exist for
the
coupling premise (albeit not complete).
From: Bob Cook
Jones--
There is no bremsstrahlung because there are no particles emitted with
high
kinetic energy--only quantum spin energy is involved.
Bob
----- Original Message -----
Wiki has a superficial entry for quantum probability
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_probability
and a more complete entry for S-Matrix
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S-matrix
The crux of this post is to suggest that the alumina tube reactor operates
via an enhanced "probability field" favoring a rare nuclear reaction, and
that the key to this probability enhancement is photonic .... via SPP -
surface plasmon polaritons.
Specifically, the premise is that in an intense flux of IR photons, which
is
initiated by incandesce, the low probability of a few nuclear reactions,
especially those involving Li-6, can be enhanced and at the same time
excess
energy which is derived can be absorbed by the photonic flux, creating a
positive feedback parameter. Because the underlying reaction is gamma
free,
and the sole component of ash is alpha particles, the missing mechanism
(for
now) is the coupling of the 3 alpha emission to the photonic flux (Li6 +
Li6
3He).
From there on, the details of how the expected bremsstrahlung can be
completely downshifted require "illumination"... but the missing
mechanism
may have been hidden in plain view, all along. This premise is easily
falsifiable.
More later,
Jones
