http://unifiedgravity.com/resources/WO2014189799-PAMPH-330-2.pdf
*       Everything is pointing to lithium as the key to LENR - yet lithium
was there, carefully hidden in plain view, all the way back in 1989.
By this I mean that P&F used lithium electrolyte - yet lithium was almost
ignored as being active, since everyone thought that D+D fusion was
occurring - mainly because of the helium ash. This choice was because the
"textbook" Coulomb barrier seems to be far higher for lithium, so Li was
essentially discounted. In either case, the ash is helium.
In retrospect - it is plausible that P&F were seeing lithium fusion all
along, since (Li+D) is favored under certain conditions, according to this
gravity theory. 
That is to say, if Lipinski's theory is correct, the Coulomb barrier for
lithium shrinks by a factor of several thousand times (at a resonance
point); and thus the barrier is far easier to overcome when it is in the
"sweet spot" which is in the range of 223 eV (compared to two deuterons -
which barrier is nominally 1.5 MeV).
>From the Lipinski patent: 
[0080] The amount of energy imparted to the protons as predicted by the
inventor's gravity theory to create the proton-lithium fusion reaction is
surprisingly low. The theory predicts that fusion efficiency will be
significantly increased when a proton that has overcome the Coulomb barrier
has energy close to 223 e V. The experimental results described later in
this application verify that by imparting kinetic energy to protons near the
predicted energy range results in high rates of fusion that produces helium
ions.
Here is another interesting connection involving nickel, hydrogen and
lithium. 223 eV is in the range of nickel's Rydberg redundancy levels -
which are at IP 5 and 6. Nickel like many transition metals, can be
hexavalent.
Therefore, it can be imagined that on occasion, f/H is both formed and then
accelerated by UV photon flux - such as the 299 eV UV photons which are
emitted by nickel. and from there, it fuses with lithium.
Wow. How sweet it is.

 


Reply via email to