My question is how can we use this information to reduce the Coulomb force in Lithium. Can Lipinski's theory be used to build a device be snapped on to an old PF cell and get instant results? How can the existing batch of dogbone, Rossi and other LENR experiments be modified to potentially use this fusion loophole?
In what ways can one impart 223 eV of kinetic energy to protons? Electromagnetic stimulation, heat/pressure fluctuation, laser? Lipinski mentions other methods that have not been tested [0081]. Jack- there are at least two experiments referenced in the patent-- one calculated heat at 142 W [0254], the other [0082] said 16kw was produced... for 72 hours . That much excess energy can't be just calculated and ignored-- their reservoir [0158] of cooling water they mention would get hot fast--and I only glimpsed a five gallon bucket in the pictures that 'might' have been for cooling. (A big 240 VAC spa heater draws ~10kW.) BTW, some of the other patents are interesting-- Lipinski talks of direct DC generation, a gravity thrust engine, and more... - Brad On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 7:30 AM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > The theory that is referenced in the patent can be found here: > www.actaphys.uj.edu.pl/_old/vol39/pdf/v39p2823.pdf > > Bob Cook > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jones Beene" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 7:23 AM > Subject: RE: [Vo]:UnifiedGravity - Lipinski > > > > From: Bob Cook > * > * I am confused: Does the Lipinski theory say the proton has to have > 223 ev of kinetic energy over and above the amount of kinetic energy to > exceed the Coulomb barrier, or just 223 ev coming in to the Li nucleus? > (Paragraph 0080 of the patent is ambiguous.) > > I do not see ambiguity, however, it is complicated. The proton acceleration > looks straightforward to me – proton needs to have 223 eV excess energy, but > not very much more or less. Since they accelerate protons to higher energy – > then apparently they have found the balance where the most protons are > decelerated to the correct level. > > That is why I was calling this 223 eV a “sweet spot” but perhaps I am > missing something… since the lack of interest from major players is > alarming. The major problem with the whole thing is that this work goes back > a long way – 10 years – and yet they have not interested anyone with funds > to invest. Very suspicious. > > Brad Lowe has been tracking this technology - and has found additional > filings: > > http://www.google.com/patents/US20090274256 [2009] > http://www.google.com/patents/WO2008063254A3 [ 2008] > FUSION HEAT ENGINE AND ELECTROGRAVITY GENERATOR METHODS AND APPLICATIONS > [2010] > https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2010008625&recNum= > 1&maxRec=&office=&prevFilter=&sortOption=&queryString=&tab=PCT+Biblio > > > > > > >
