Bad news... From MFMP Facebook page: "Re-heat of *GlowStick* GS3 reveals scalar offset between active and null."
It require some analysis, but the offset is about as high as the difference in temperature observed during the test that (apparently?) showed excess heat... It is important to note, though, that this offset was not observed during this initial test. But it definitely show that some work in better measuring equipment is necessary. Alberto. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 12:05 AM, Mark Jurich <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Alberto: > > Great job on the plotting. I am going to refrain commenting about > excess heat at this time, but I have a few suggestions/comments: > > 1) It is my understanding that the Coil Resistance is 8.5 ohms cold (Room > Temperature) and the largest value I heard Alan mention during the > experiment was 9.1 ohms. At this point, I would assume a linear > relationship with temperature of the Coil Resistance, and using the two > data points given (9.1 ohm at the maximum obtained temperature), replot the > power curve taking into account the Coil Resistance Variation. > > 2) Annotate the two “Y” Axis (Left/Right) as Temperature [C] and Power [W]. > > 3) Compute/Estimate the Heat Capacity of the Null Reactor/Cell and the > Fueled Cell, and divide the two. This will give us an idea how large the > Cells are off from each other. The Null Cell has the same pressure as the > Fueled Cell, but is “filled” with an Alumina Plug with a “Press Fit”. The > Fueled Cell has Nickel and much more Hydrogen Gas by Volume than the Null > Cell. Hydrogen Gas has a Heat Capacity Value, itself. Those are the > differences in Heat Capacity and Thermal Mass. You can start with a Heat > Capacity of an Alumina Cylinder and Kanthal Heater Coil of given diameter > (sorry, I don’t recall the diameter off the top of my head). There is a > rather nice drawing Alan made with the dimensions. If you need some help, > post and I am sure we will help out where we can. > > Also, unfortunately Heat Capacity is a function of temperature and we will > have to dig up some data on that, to make a better estimate. > > Thanks and keep up the good work! > > - Mark > > > *From:* Alberto De Souza <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Monday, June 01, 2015 8:30 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [Vo]:MFMP has presented the strongest evidence of excess heat > due to LENR so far > > In the graph attached, I have plotted data made public by the MFMP. The > graph shows the temperature in a (null hypothesis) empty reactor (that was > run in series with a loaded reactor), the temperature of the loaded > reactor, and the power applied to both; both reactors were heated by the > resistances of the same value. The three variables were plotted according > to a moving average of 1000 samples. The power was computed by squaring the > voltage and dividing it by 8.6 (the resistance of the heater). As the graph > shows, there is strong evidence of excess heat - the power applied to the > system reduces, but the active reactor increases its temperature. IMHO, > this experiment is the best proof of excess heat due to LENR so far. > > Alberto. > > ps. link to graph: > https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=914302228591022&set=p.914302228591022&type=1 >
