Thank you Jed for the info you share with us.
What concern me here in this test is that T1(red) has not the same behaviour before and after that T3(blue) has broken. For the same voltage (cyan), the maximum temperature reported by T1 aren’t correlated with an excess heat occurring. If an excess heat was present, and for the same voltage, T1 after T3 broken should be above T1 before the T3 broken. It is not the case, worst it is even below. T1 doesn’t show any excess heat, even if it is the farther of the TCs. How can you believe a TC after he has reached is maximum allowed temperature? T2 has moved far above the limit, how the chromel or alumel will behave after the cooldown, if we can still call them chromel and alumel … I’m pretty sure this is not a Type K TC anymore. Anyway, for sure, something happened when T3 has broken: Chemistry or LENR excess heat? Arnaud _____ From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: mardi 2 juin 2015 23:39 To: [email protected] Subject: [Vo]:Jiang slides Fig. 6 To reiterate, Jiang's slides are here: https://www.scribd.com/doc/267085905/New-Result-on-Anomalous-Heat-Production-in-Hydrogen-loaded Here are his additional comments: http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/06/01/songsheng-jiang-answers-questions-on-lenr-replication-report/ Here is a comment he sent to me. "The experiment curves on the screen of the computer (Fig. 6) were measured in 4-7 May, 2015. The curves of T1 (red), T2 (green), T3 (blue), power voltage (cyan) and pressure (yellow) display on the screen. The T3 (blue) was broken down, when temperature rose to about 1100 0C on 5 May, 2015. Since then, T3 worked abnormally, it was not tracking T1 completely (also showing in Figure 7a)." I annotated the graph shown in Fig. 6 to show what I think he means: The annotations are: T1 higher than T2, T3 T3 (blue) malfunction T3 erratic [malfunction continues] T2 exceeds 1372°C [It exceeded that temperature earlier, briefly] It does look like T3 malfunctioned suddenly. It stayed low, well below T1 (the red line). I asked him how many hours Fig. 6 shows. Maybe it is the entire 96 hours? - Jed
