Thank you Jed for the improved quality for the pictures.
Look at my picture http://imgur.com/oAMdOfT Ive drawn 2 vertical lines: One before the T3 failure called A, and one after the T3 failure called B. It is supposed than at A, the excess heat didnt started. At point B, it is supposed that excess heat is occurring because T2 is above T1. BUT, At point A, the power is lesser than at B, but temperature is higher! We should have the opposite. Moreover, if there is excess heat occurring at point B, the delta of T1 (@ B - @ A) should even higher! So I doubt here that there is excess heat at point B. Another point, the T2 thermocouple has been to a temperature far above what chromel or alumel can survive to. The temperature of T2 increased far above 1400°C. Most probably, the T2 has been destroyed at that moment. The measurements that the T2 gives after the breakdown can not be trusted anymore. A new experiment with type B thermocouples (T2 and T3) should be redone before stating any conclusions of excess heat. _____ From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: mercredi 3 juin 2015 16:58 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Jiang slides Fig. 6 Jiang sent me a cleaner version of his Fig. 6 data. I will translate the headings and annotate this later. See: http://lenr-canr.org/Collections/Jiang%20DATA%202015-May-04%20to%20May-07.pd f Below the x-axis it just says "Channel 01, Channel 02 . . ." I am not sure what channel is what. I think it is: 01 T1 (thermocouple 1, placed at heater) 02 T2 03 T3 04 Pressure? 05 ?? 06 Power supply 07 T4? Temperature at outside surface (outside MgO insulation) Pretty sure. 08 (white line) not used, except that it shows a pulse at around 09:00 on May 6. - Jed
