_____
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: mercredi 3 juin 2015 21:15
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Jiang slides Fig. 6
Arnaud Kodeck <[email protected]> wrote:
BUT,
At point A, the power is lesser than at B, but temperature is higher! We
should have the opposite.
I do not think the difference in input electric power is significant. Just
before hour 06:00 the power was turned down. I think the red temperature T1
is still falling at the point you marked "A."
You are right here. T1 is still falling but at a very slow pace. It will
never go down below point B at that point of falling rate.
Moreover, if there is excess heat occurring at point B, the delta of T1 (@ B
- @ A) should even higher! So I doubt here that there is excess heat at
point B.
Yes, I agree this is a problem. As you say, the T1 temperature at "B" is a
little lower, but it should be much higher. If there is anomalous heat
coming from the core of the reactor, that should push T1 up, well above
where it goes with heat from the electric heater only.
>From hour 12:00 up to about 15:00 (when T3 breaks) input electric power is
fairly stable. It goes up only a little. Yet the T1, T2 and T3 temperatures
all rise. That looks to me like real excess heat coming from somewhere in
the reactor. At 15:00 T2 and T3 are still below T1, which I suppose
indicates the excess heat is lower than the input electric power heat.
Yes something has happened for sure. That is undoubtedly.
I cannot tell whether this excess heat is anomalous (from cold fusion) or
whether it is a chemical reaction.
I think at point "B" the T1 temperature should be much higher than it was at
point "A" if there is still excess heat being produced. It should stay up at
the peak it reached at around 16:00, an hour after T3 broke.
My assumption, the event between 12:00 and 15:00 has been above a threshold
that destroyed the NAE. That's just an hypothesis .
- Jed
