http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16541664

Alumina and zirconia powder mix (l00%Al2O3, 60%Al2O3+40%ZrO2, 40%
Al2O3+60%ZrO2, 100% ZrO2) were respectively press-compacted was heated to
1600C in a  idomestic microwave oven (850 W, 2 450 MHz)

On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> https://www.wpi.edu/academics/math/CIMS/IMMG/Seminars/Past/Seminar12/Docs/Paper-12-9.pdf
>
> It is possible to build a custom microwave oven fed by two 1 kW, 2.45 GHz
> magnetrons to heat alumina up to 1300C.
>
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>  As Peter laments, there are two extremes in the recent LENR news.
>>
>> Thomas Clark’s report lucidly states exactly what many of us having been
>> saying for months about the flawed Lugano report.
>>
>> The good news in the provocative site:
>>
>> *http://tet.in.ua/index.php/en/* <http://tet.in.ua/index.php/en/>
>>
>> Which is the Laboratory of Experimental Physics — also known as “TET” —
>> in Ukraine and also in Moscow. Curiously, it combines Russian and
>> Ukrainian efforts towards alternative energy.
>>
>> The curious part of this partnership goes all the way back to Chernobyl –
>> another joint effort that resulted in catastrophe, but which result could
>> be rectified to a large extent if this new effort is successful.
>>
>> The induction coil seems to offer the most promise to me – especially
>> when the copper coil can double as the calorimeter - in the way Jack
>> Cole has proposed. The Ukrainians seem to be doing exactly the same
>> thing with the pictured coil which is covered in furnace cement. The
>> problem with this approach, as Jack has documented on his blog, is
>> capturing a larger proportion of the input energy than is normally
>> possible with an induction setup.
>>
>> I believe this can be done. I have recently seen a report showing that
>> induction cooktops, when properly designed at the best resonance level
>> can actually apply more net energy from the grid to a cooking utensil
>> than direct contact with the traditional resistive heating element –
>> which is a surprise since we assume the latter is nearly 100% (it isn’t).
>>
>> Jones
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to