I'm trying to dig this up, I just noted that this should be from john, > > "I retract here recent comments I have made indicating that > > > Randell Mills' orbitsphere must radiate and therefore be unstable. > > > There are gaps in what I erroneously regarded as mathematical > > > proof of the flaws in the model. I regret having overstated my > > > conclusions and I recognize that there is merit in Dr. Mills' > > > extensively developed arguments. And again I apologize for > > > unwarranted and uncomplimentary statements I have made regarding > > > Dr. Mills himself, and wish him the best of luck in pursuing > > > his ambitious goals."
So he seams to have backpedaled here, I will continue to search for more critique of the double slit. Thanks! On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > What is there to enjoy? This is 10 year old stuff which was challenged by > John Connett a decade ago, and is not worth anyone’s effort to revisit. > > > > What people here (and everywhere else) challenge Mills to do is to present > a robust experiment which can be replicated by others with no strings > attached. For instance, Jeff Driscoll has been trying forever to find any > hint of energy gain using Mills theory. > > > > He is a still a true believer, but has nothing to show for his dedication, > AFAIK. > > > > *From:* Stefan Israelsson Tampe > > > > I know that people here challenge Randy Mills theory to explain the result > of the double slit experiment. Turns out that BLP has published their > hypothesis there for you to read. Consider reading, > > > > http://www.blacklightpower.com/theory-2/theory/double-slit/ > > > > General remark. Quantum mechanics would probably be considered a crackpot > theory today if it where not for this experiments that proposed that > particles as both a particle property and a wave like property interpreted > as a quantum mechanical probability wave. As Faymann said : all QM can be > derived from this experiment. > > > > Enjoy! > > > > >
