Any quantum particle obeys the born rule which is a reflection of the wave nature of particles and atoms. Richard Feynman calls this sumation over all hystories. If hydrinos can produce the same results as QM, then hydrinos theory must apply to photons and atoms and neutrons and protons,,,on and on. Confirm or deny,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_integral_formulation On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < [email protected]> wrote: > If you read the link you see that the QM predictions of intensities and > Mills is essentially the same so for this experiment > there is an overlap. > > Regards > Stefan > > On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Does the Mills theory explain the Born rule for two or more slits? >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Born_rule >> >> On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I know that people here challenge Randy Mills theory to explain the >>> result of the double slit experiment. Turns out that BLP has published >>> their hypothesis there for you to read. Consider reading, >>> >>> http://www.blacklightpower.com/theory-2/theory/double-slit/ >>> >>> General remark. Quantum mechanics would probably be considered a >>> crackpot theory today if it where not for this experiments that proposed >>> that particles as both a particle property and a wave like property >>> interpreted as a quantum mechanical probability wave. As Faymann said : all >>> QM can be derived from this experiment. >>> >>> Enjoy! >>> >>> >>> >> >
