I'm fully aware of the fundaments of QM, Mills theory is not QM so the born rule is generally not satisfied or is there a link somehow (the eigenvalues QED and Mills theory are almost a perfect match for the hydrogen atom and there is no calculation error done by Mills.). Anyhow for the specific experiment there is an overlap, Mills indicates that the Heessenberg inequality is valid both in QM sense and as a classical sense for this particular experiment. I would then assume that the result of the Born rule or the deduction from the classical analysis of Mills produces the same answer. Anyhow if one could stimulate variations of the energies of the produced photons that transfer the momentum to the electron perhaps the validity of QM or Mills could be separated.
Cheers! On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > Any quantum particle obeys the born rule which is a reflection of the wave > nature of particles and atoms. Richard Feynman calls this sumation over > all hystories. If hydrinos can produce the same results as QM, then > hydrinos theory must apply to photons and atoms and neutrons and > protons,,,on and on. Confirm or deny, > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_integral_formulation > > On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> If you read the link you see that the QM predictions of intensities and >> Mills is essentially the same so for this experiment >> there is an overlap. >> >> Regards >> Stefan >> >> On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Does the Mills theory explain the Born rule for two or more slits? >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Born_rule >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I know that people here challenge Randy Mills theory to explain the >>>> result of the double slit experiment. Turns out that BLP has published >>>> their hypothesis there for you to read. Consider reading, >>>> >>>> http://www.blacklightpower.com/theory-2/theory/double-slit/ >>>> >>>> General remark. Quantum mechanics would probably be considered a >>>> crackpot theory today if it where not for this experiments that proposed >>>> that particles as both a particle property and a wave like property >>>> interpreted as a quantum mechanical probability wave. As Faymann said : all >>>> QM can be derived from this experiment. >>>> >>>> Enjoy! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
