My bad - I thought your closed form geometry equals a wavelength that matches our plane and persists in our plane as a physical manifestation like a canoe stuck in the waterfall whereas all other virtual particles form the ether medium and just flow thru - their rate of flow establishing the isotropy. My fringe theory is that you don't need near C spatial displacement to create relativistic inertial frames - that extreme Casimir suppression can make a near C differential thru "equivalent" negative acceleration using a gravity warp instead of a gravity well - the nature of the Casimir formula making the area effected very small but trumping the local isotropy normally ruled by square law and doing so with geometry instead of rocket fuel. I think catalytic action is a very mild dynamic form of these negative inertial frames, and like satellites circling the earth the relativistic portion is almost negligible. When the relativistic portion starts to increase to where the suppression of vacuum wavelengths inside the cavity compared to macro isotropy outside approaches the same differential as a stationary spacecraft in free space relative to another sitting at the bottom of a large gravity well is when I think anomalous heat and radioactive half lives occur. Geometric suppression slows the ether like an umbrella requiring no energy instead of the normal analogy of a car racing thru a rainstorm to increase the pressure on the windshield. I don't think anyone would argue free energy if a machine could be loaded without gravity and then be moved without energy to a gravity well to extract the potential energy of the load BUT you would obviously be supplying the energy by moving it between frames. In Casimir suppression you have a tapestry of negative frames at one scale but you still have random motion of gas law at the local scale that does the moving for you. You still need a "machine" to extract energy from the frame changes - to make a gainful reversible reaction that is loaded in one frame and harvested in another. Fran
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 10:33 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Re: Fractional Hydrogen without Mills In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Tue, 7 Jul 2015 00:19:39 +0000: Hi, [snip] > >I agree.. closed form being a canoe stuck in the waterfall of our 3D plane all >the rest is the medium of time passing thru it. Not exactly what I had in mind. :) What I meant by "closed form" was a geometric closed form, like a circle, a sphere, a toroid etc. (or some combination of these). >Fran > >IMO, all energy is motion in the substance of the vacuum. When that motion >occurs in a closed form, the result is a particle. This was also Fred Sparber's >point of view if a IIRC. I think he was right. >[snip] >Regards, > >Robin van Spaandonk > >http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
